See you on Monday, cheating for 96 hours - Jack Ma strongly supports the article, forgiveness and silence are golden

An old Chinese saying goes, "Water will overflow, the moon will be full, and the flowers will be full will be lost," reminds people not to go too far. Once that degree is passed, the nature of things can change. At first, the media surrounded Wen Zhang, but when the news began to continue to be revealed to his daughter, things changed subtly. Wen Zhang yelled angrily, pointing at Xie Xiao and Chen Chaohua: I am a bad life, please let the child go. Because of the involvement of children in this battle, many netizens began to stand on the side of the article. As media leaders who were the first investigation to reveal the incident, Xie Xiao and Chen Chaohua entered the public eye. Because of successfully reporting this incident, Xie Xiao, executive editor of a certain weekly magazine, also became a sensational figure, showing off their contributions everywhere, and even successfully played the role of "benefactor": Ma Yip sent a text message to thank us. It seems that Chinese media rarely achieve such brilliant victory.

Why does the media keep an eye on the article? Xie Xiao replied: As a media person, the first thing you consider in your work is news value, and then news ethics. Of course I don’t want the wife to be separated by revealing the cruel but real side of life. As a woman with a family and a child, she is actually softer in this regard. So I only published the article after weighing the trade-offs and making a decision for a long time. He also did some aftermath work, and had contacted Wen and Ma in terms of being a non-media person, and advised them to be together. When "suggesting them together" comes out of their mouths, is it a bit self-deprecating? I guess even she herself can't believe that she is so kind. If this is true, why did the report come out and why didn’t you contact Ma Yip directly? This is originally a family business. Is such a long and chunky report like an attitude of "suggesting them to be together"?

Does this represent the style of a large number of Chinese media people now: news ethics precede news value, and no matter what impact the incident has on society or the parties involved, they will not pay attention to the right and wrong of news ethics, let alone consider the scale of reporting. As long as the goal is achieved by any means, it will be a great victory? Sadly, the "news value" mentioned by Editor Xie: Why is it this kind of gossip privacy? Why did the Malaysia Airlines incident turn a blind eye to such great news value? Why did all Chinese media lose the Malaysia Airlines incident?

The lice on the bald man's head is obviously the "news value" that the Chinese media always claims is selective, because this selectivity just shows the ugly soul of the Chinese media. Judging from the incident of encirclement and suppression of articles, we can summarize a few points: Although articles are stars, they are individuals, belong to vulnerable groups and have no background. Second, things like articles can satisfy the public's desire to peep, and can add the sales and popularity of the publication. Third, the media can act as a moral judge and expand the popularity of this media. So they are willing to spend eight months tracking "articles", are willing to spend all their time looking for filming characters, are more willing to gossip about privacy, and then carefully plan "See you on Monday", which is a lot of money. This is the utilitarian point of the Chinese media.

If Chinese media used half of the articles to report in the Malaysia Airlines incident, they would definitely not have failed in the face of Western media. But I found the uncrowned pleasure in an actor. Don’t all Chinese media feel blushed? Don’t you feel sad? The Malaysia Airlines incident involved hundreds of lives, and its news value was much greater than that of a small actor's "article", and even more than "how is the child of the article now." Many Chinese media need to seriously reflect on why so many valuable news turn a blind eye, why so dark events do not have the courage to report, and why all of them are so cowardly in the face of truly valuable news.

When a netizen questioned Xie Xiao, you were not doing this kind of thing kindly, I'm sorry to the parties involved. To expose people's privacy, if I am @安 @Ma Yip @Yao Di, I will definitely resort to the law. Xie Xiao’s answer is quite confident: China has no privacy laws, and if we refer to foreign cases, the media will definitely win. This is what makes Chinese media people both clever and ugly. When they benefit, they will not think about "news ethics" matters, nor will they care about the fire in the city gate and the fish pond. When they are criticized for journalistic ethics, they will think of loopholes in the law to escape. This is the sorrow of China's vulnerable groups, because the Chinese media has found a way out. The father-in-law of the article said on Weibo, "My granddaughter suddenly said to her daughter Ma Yili during dinner yesterday: Mom, everyone on TV says, you and your father are divorced? I wonder how you, as parents, feel when you hear your children say this?" If the media crosses the basic reporting standards, is it time for your conscience to be self-examination? Is it a dangerous moment? Is it time to rectify?

At the charity meeting, Jack Ma mocked the media's indifference to real charity and his pursuit of gossip incidents. He also supported the article: "Each of us has a tolerance, understanding, and help, but today when I talk about the article, everyone laughed... First of all, I would like to thank Fatty Wen. Today, the article made a mistake that men basically make, but he participated in and launched this charity event to tell everyone what autism is. The outside world cannot erase the charity he has done because of a mistake, because the person who laughs at him now may also make such mistakes in the future. I hope everyone will give him some chance, support and understanding, and don't let Fatty Wen become an autistic child and dare not go out." Jack Ma was telling the media how to learn to look at people in two, how to learn to forgive, and how to remain silent is also a noble virtue.

The media needs to be tolerant, and China needs to be tolerant even more!